harc agreed with this statement: “currently holding assets on the exchange”
EnglishAirdop criteria
Airdrop tires
- Old users before January
- Trading volume min 100$ based upon the volume
quality increase - Repeat users
- Gitcoin points above 100 to prevent syible
Trading volume should be an important basis, not some speculators for airdrops
I feel that you are too cute. What the project party wants most now is how to raise funds to repay the loan, but you are fighting each other here.😂😂😂
Guys, I think as of now there will be no airdrop. The founder himself said that IDO recipients will have an incentive to vote for NO airdrop. And they will be within their rights to do so.
Yes , this will be great . We are in from the Testnet , Starknet .
nour I like the approach. I think a cut-off should definitely be before the token contract was made, so around 13 June or earlier - a lot of people suddenly appeared around then with tiny spammy swaps, so it would filter out a lot of noise. Not sure needs to be as early as April but could reward an “early adopter” if that’s important, or a slight multiplier for number of weeks over which swaps were made, ignoring activity in just a single week.
I like the Optimism condition of “repeat user” (e.g. used in 4 different weeks over any period). I’d say >5 swaps over 4 different weeks is a reasonable definition of a regular user. 5 swaps on one day with no more activity is just an airdrop hunter.
Other stuff to factor in as a multiplier if people think it’s been useful:
- community support - level of activity in discord, maybe number of > 9 character posts to skip the wen token + gm crew
- financial support (early liquidity providers / Atlendis lenders / gitcoin donors to Zigzag)
- decentralisation support - running a MM bot (although doing this means lots of trades so I guess would get rewarded anyway by volume / number of swaps)
I don’t know how difficult it is to implement this, but I think a series of multipliers for several useful activities would be the best method. Dydx-style as a minimum!
In my opinion, the criteria should be based on the reuse of the platform in order to weed out as much as possible participants who came only once in order to receive a drop. The second criterion is volume. the team needs to determine the trading threshold for receiving an airdrop. The third is the time period!
that right , i think so
Team ZigZag, just do DYDX style airdrop with some multiplier for early users, it will be awesome! To claim ZZ tokens users need to add more trading volume as they did to claim DYDX tokens. It will be the best scenario. I understand that you have mentioned that DAO (IDO participants) only can decide about an airdrop and in this case all our suggestions here for the team are meaningless. However, I hope that community suggestions will be taken into consideration by DAO holders. If DAO votes against the airdrop, project will loose very large part of the community. If DAO votes for an airdrop only for those who bought IDO tokens, project will loose large number of community members including me as I will be on the road trip all day on June 24th and will not be able to participate in IDO. I have used the platform many times since 2021 and have very nice trading volumes, but will not be able to participate in IDO. In this case you know how I feel if airdrop will be given only to those who took part in IDO. In general, I think that ZigZag team should decide about the airdrop model, not IDO participants!!!
In my opinion, a good criterion is the number of transactions (more than 5), periodicity, there were repeated transactions in a week or two and the volume of transactions 100-1k, 1k-10k, 10k-100k
You said right thing
I think that’s great idea
Early user deserve reward