There are few points which I’m suggesting that team and community think about it.
shailesh Hi! Are you in DEV’s team?
shailesh can’t disagree with this one makes sense
shailesh
I think #1 and #4 are good, but any bridge should count as “ok”. volume of 1k is questionable kinda, depends if you want only give rich whales money and not poor ppl.
shailesh probably a few different tiers for different volumes
shailesh 25+ transactions? seriously? So, you proposing the things you already did by expecting this airdrop? 25+ transactions is a dumb proposal. Huge airdrops such as uniswap, dydx, ens or optimism never asked for this dumb criterion.
shailesh ###
I agree with mrKing. I think it should be any one of the four. Galxe campaigns are a good idea. or there is CREW3. Maybe different sized airdrops depending on how many activies were achieved. One of those options could be for early adopters as well. Thanks for you time.
yes anyone who fit under these 4 or any 1 of these 4 should be eligible
Not everyone will have used the Zigzag bridge, especially if they wanted to avoid high fees from Eth mainnet. Does it matter how funds were moved to Zigzag? The point is the engagement with the exchange etc, surely.
I think that instead of people farming airdrops now due to the bear market, it could be better to add a criterion for early users that suppoerted the project in its very early days, and used the product initially as well as consistently
Binance aba holders, who have been certified by Binance’s real-name authentication, do activities on https://galxe.com/campaigns. Users who have certified discord, twiter, and mailboxes in gla will receive nft, which further proves that they are real users.
HOW TO VOTE
Yea… How to vote?
i dont exchange? why
totally agree
How to vote?
HELLO! Just finding ZigZag.. XXO
Think anyone should be eligible if using ZigZag
Not everyone Has $1000 to spend
mutlaka hacim kriteri olmalı
I agree that conditions need to be tightened for proper airdrop.