I am an ordinary user who noticed the platform not so long ago. Of course I really like it (the bridge is just gorgeous).

I agree with the users who offer to distribute the award to early users, but in my opinion, REAL users should also receive the award.

It seems to me that the developers of the platform should weed out fake accounts that made exchanges in order to receive awards. As an option, I suggest developers to check whether the user has made transactions in other networks (so it will be clear whether this is a real user or not)

Also, I don’t really agree that it is necessary to give a reward to users who have interacted with the discord of the project.

Of course, they have contributed to the project, but it has nothing to do with the use of the platform.

As an option, distribute NFT (with utility) to users who helped the platform develop socially.

In my opinion, it would be fair to give the awards to the following users:

  1. Those who interacted with the platform at the very start

  2. Those who interacted with the platform before the awards were announced (Until June 20)

  3. Those who used the full functionality of the platform, that is, used the bridge and made more than 5-10 swaps.

  4. NFT with usability for active discord and twitter users.

  5. Those who donated funds for the project.

It is necessary to weed out fake wallets made specifically for receiving awards (which have a small number of transactions in the polygon OR BSC OR Ethereum networks)

In my opinion, it would be fair.

    I want to emphasize that the age of use of the platform should not affect the receipt of the award, and this should be influenced by whether the wallet is real or it was created solely to receive the award.

    I believe that ordinary people who have used the platform should get some kind of bonus. There is no need to create a negative attitude towards the platform by removing them from the reward, creating unrealistic conditions for receiving it.

    I hope the developers will see my thoughts and listen to them. Thank you for your attention and for the excellent DEX platform!

    Some thought should be given to those who donated the initial liquidity in Nov-Jan
    I don’t know if that’s covered in the “donation” other had suggested.

    Multiple swaps on different weeks and gitcoin donors also.

    Astoneer Let me ask you, why should I have a lot of transactions on other networks? What if I created a wallet specifically to work with the zkSync network? I have a lot of transactions in it, more than 10 in 3-4 different weeks for more than half a year. I need clear criteria.

      In my opinion it will be fair team decide who will get airdrop, because team have lost of tokens vested.
      Early users, active users , bridge user.
      more rewards to those who help project in Discord , etc.
      I

      I would vote for advanced dydx model with combination of HOP sybil protection:
      The idea is to reward large community, but on the other hand remove sybilloooors
      Snapshot - 30.April
      Eligible users:

      • bridge users (some minimum volume e.g. 250usd)
      • traders minimum volume 250-500 usd and 5 transactions (dydx tiers - e.g. 250, 1k, 5k, 10k, 100k)
      • Gitcoin donators
      • Most discord active users

      Outsource and incentivise finding 10+ connected wallets
      Also I would vote for vesting of eligible addresses (claiming milestones, incentivise not dumping immediately)

      Read here the comments and conditions that people offer. And you can understand a couple of things. There are a lot of greedy people here. And if the community decides who to distribute the coins to. Then the distribution from Hop and Optimism will be very good compared to ZigZag. Selfish community = bad market entry.

      Only high of volumen maby. No started date. Snapshot last week.

        trading volume has value. More volume is more risk. Especially for early users.

        Majki669 that is good for airdrop hunters, cose we all know what has been needed in older airdops

          So you want more drops for social tasks and less for on-chain activity?
          Sounds crazy to me. Better make it with different criteria like early users, trade volume base multiplier, and different dao users. Yah, also can be added for some social tasks too, but that’s less important in web3 airdrops criteria.

          remember that ZigZag also has a Grant on Gitcoin, I think it’s a good idea to allocate it for donors on gitcoin, especially ZigZag donors.