I think that the date of the picture should be made today, but before the tweet


I think that the snapshot should be done before June 17, before the post zigzag in Twitter, because after that message, a lot of people went to spin a lot of volumes and maximally test the exchange

    alexiyko
    Even tho there was a date announced I doubt many people tried to do transactions so its kinda unecessary in my opinion.
    Especially since many thought the snapshot is already done.

    Thats why I said perfect time to do a cut, especially since everyone had the chance until last moment and nobody will be left out!

    • Palu replied to this.

        alexiyko
        I dont like this. It was known for a year that zigzag will do an airdrop. We should just cut it at 19th and call it a day. I thought they will have some major partnership or list on arbitrum tbh 😂

        Having extra token for different criteria sounds like the best idea. ZigZag will hopefully go the dydx route with changes added.

        @ZigZag Labs Team I hope you guys read this post aswell many great ideas 😄

          When you say “fix date to 19th,” the 19th of what month?

          • Toxi replied to this.

            Team ZigZag, just do DYDX style airdrop with some multiplier for early users, it will be awesome! To claim ZZ tokens users need to add more trading volume as they did to claim DYDX tokens. It will be the best scenario. I understand that you have mentioned that DAO (IDO participants) only can decide about an airdrop and in this case all our suggestions here for the team are meaningless. However, I hope that community suggestions will be taken into consideration by DAO holders. If DAO votes against the airdrop, project will loose very large part of the community. If DAO votes for an airdrop only for those who bought IDO tokens, project will loose large number of community members including me as I will be on the road trip all day on June 24th and will not be able to participate in IDO. I have used the platform many times since 2021 and have very nice trading volumes, but will not be able to participate in IDO. In this case you know how I feel if airdrop will be given only to those who took part in IDO. In general, I think that ZigZag team should decide about the airdrop model, not IDO participants!!!

              Toxi
              As far as I understood the airdrop will be determined by ido participants. I hope they understand with an airdrop more people will find zigzag 😄

                I would vote for advanced dydx model with combination of HOP sybil protection:
                The idea is to reward large community, but on the other hand remove sybilloooors
                Snapshot - 30.April
                Eligible users:

                bridge users (some minimum volume e.g. 250usd)
                traders minimum volume 250-500 usd and 5 transactions (dydx tiers - e.g. 250, 1k, 5k, 10k, 100k)
                Gitcoin donators
                Most discord active users
                Outsource and incentivise finding 10+ connected wallets
                Also I would vote for vesting of eligible addresses (claiming milestones, incentivise not dumping immediately)

                  anoinevlastne
                  I was for volume aswell but the more I think about it, the less I like it tbh 😄
                  I like the claiming milestones, that would be a great addition. @Toxi pls add it to the list ☝️

                      trading volume has value. More volume is more risk. Especially for users who used ZZ long time ago

                      You should take a snapshot of the users who participated in the airdrop before you twitter on the 18th

                      Toxi agree. dydx with a twist –> working on something but trying to figure out how to make it even better should be the starting point.